artist
date_end	1533-10-03
date_start	1533-10-03
excerpt_id	747668
quote	Meester pieter van cloetinge b[eclaecht] daniel willems z[oon] snyder Seggen[de] dat hy zyn zoon mit pieter voirs[eyde] besteedt heeft om tambocht van glaesmaicken te lee[re]n en[de] hy zyn[en] vollen tyt niet wtgegaen en Is dat hy hem dat by meesters vand[en] ambochte beteren zal of IJ £ gr[oten] vl[aem]s daer voer Is geappo[in]cteert by scepen[en] dat p[er]tyen gaen zullen by m[eeste]rs om te accorde[re]n en[de] Indien zyl[uyden] nyet en accordee[re]n alsdan weder te Rechte te comen actum vt sup[ra]
summary	Master Pieter van Cloetinge sues Daniel Willemsz, tailor, because Daniel’s son did not serve his time as Pieter’s apprentice. Pieter demands compensation to be determined by the masters of the glassmaker’s craft, or pay £ 2. On October 3, the magistrates decide that both parties should come together with the masters of the craft to come to an agreement. If they do not agree, they should come back to court.
tags	a:3:{s:7:"keyword";a:2:{i:0;s:9:"glazenier";i:1;s:8:"leerling";}s:6:"person";a:1:{i:0;s:32:"Pieter van Cloetinge | glazenier";}s:5:"craft";a:1:{i:0;s:9:"glazenier";}}
title_archive	archief Schepenbank (Oud Rechterlijk Archief)