artist	Meesz, Havick
date_end	1532-07-26
date_start	1532-07-26
excerpt_id	747731
quote	Pieter Jans z[oen] gem[achtich]t van Jacop Jans z[oen] brocker b[eclaecht] havick mees z[oen] mit alydt cornelis dochter zyn wyff en[de] zeyt dat havick mees z[oen] voirs[eyd] annetgen des voirs[eyden] Jacop Jansz[oen]s huysvr[ouw]e alhier binnen leyden heeft doen arreste[re]n / nyet Jegenstaen[de] dat annetgen en[de] Jacop Jansz[oen] voirs[eyden] poerters van dezer stede zyn en[de] boven dat mit zekere dreigeme[n]ten haer verthonen[de] om haer In vangenisse te brengen / der voirn[oemden] annetgen by manier van cope ofhandich gemaect heeft twie last [“geerst” stricken out] [“geerst” interlineated] buyten consente en[de] by wes[en] van Jacop Jans z[oen] voirs[eyd] Concludeert pieter Jans z[oen] voir[seyd Ind[en] naem als voe[re]n dat by scepen[en] verclaert zal worden qualick en[de] Jegens Recht gearresteert en[de] dat havick mees z[oen] voirs[eyd] weder om[m]e costeloes en[de] schadeloes leve[re]n zal die voirs[eyden] twie last [“gerst” stricken out] [“geerst” interlineated] of XXXV £ gr[oten] vlaems daer voer / Protesteren[de] can scande schade cost en[de] Interest
summary	Pieter Jansz, representing Jacop Jansz Brocker, sues Havick Meesz with his wife Alydt Cornelisdr, asserting that Havick Meesz had Jacop’s wife Annetgen arrested, despite Jacop’s and Annetgen’s status as Leiden burghers, and that Havick Meesz had threated to have Annetgen imprisoned, and forced her to sell him a quantity of barley, without Jacop’s consent. Pieter Jansz (representing Jacop) demands that the court declare the arrest to have been invalid and require Havick to return the barley or pay £ 35.
tags	a:3:{s:7:"keyword";a:1:{i:0;s:11:"tinnegieter";}s:6:"person";a:1:{i:0;s:14:" | tinnegieter";}s:5:"craft";a:1:{i:0;s:11:"tinnegieter";}}
title_archive	archief Schepenbank (Oud Rechterlijk Archief), nummer toegang 0508. Civiele Rechtspraak: Inv. nos. 42+1 t/m 42+ 28 (Wedboeken)