| artist | |
| date_end | 1535-01-29 |
| date_start | 1535-01-29 |
| excerpt_id | 747828 |
| quote | Dirck huygen z[oon] schilder b[eclaecht] hillegont tJongwyf van meester Jan petyt deken van Rynlant / aernt van thienden Jan Jacops z[oon] dienaers vand[en] p[ro]visoer en[de] deken van Rynlant en[de] beatricx cornelis dochter claes Jans z[oon] van schengens wed[uw]e om getuychnisse der Wairheyt te geven up zekere Interrogatorie alsmen heml[uyden] overleve[re]n zal of elcx zes gouden karolus gul[den] daer voir / angaen[de] hillegont wtgestelt tot manendage naestcomen[de] des hair dair en binnen te leve[re]n dinterrogatorie / en[de] dande[re] personen zyn verwonnen om getuychnisse te geven actum den XXIXen January / den eersten february angaen[de] hillegont voirs[eyde] Is geappoi[n]cteert hoir beraet te hebben tot den naesten Rechtdach verwonnen by c[on]tinuacie actum den Ven february |
| summary | Dirck Huygenz, painter, sues Hillegont, maid servant of Master Jan Petyt, dean of Rijnland, Aernt van Thienden and Jan Jacopsz, servants of the vicar-general and dean of Rijnland, and Beatricx Cornelisdr, widow of Claes Jansz, to give true testimony to questions he will provide, or each pay 6 gold karolus gulden. The case concerning Hillegont is postponed to next Monday before which the questions have to be delivered to her in writing. On January 29, the other defendants lose their case by absence. On February 1, Hillegont gets time to consider her case until the next court session. On February 5, Hillegont loses her case by absence. |
| tags | a:3:{s:7:"keyword";a:1:{i:0;s:8:"schilder";}s:6:"person";a:1:{i:0;s:24:"Dirck Huygenz | schilder";}s:5:"craft";a:1:{i:0;s:8:"schilder";}} |
| title_archive | archief Schepenbank (Oud Rechterlijk Archief) |