| artist | |
| date_end | 1529-12-13 |
| date_start | 1529-12-13 |
| excerpt_id | 745963 |
| quote | pieter van Ryn en[de] jacop van langevelt b[eclaechen] willem dircx z[oon] van tetroede Jan pieters z[oon] foeye Jacops z[oon] glaesemaker en[de] m[eeste]r pieter Int scaeck om getuychnisse der Waerheyt te geven In wat manie[re]n zy duytsprake gedaen hebben tusschen pieter de bot en[de] claes dircx z[oon] tollenaer of elcq X £ groot vlaems daer voer balthazar Is te vreden tinterrogatorie over te leve[re]n tusschen dit en[de] den naesten Rechtdach om die byd[en] v[er]weerd[er]s gevisiteert te word[en] actum den XIIJen dece[m]br[is] noch wtgestelt tot den naesten Rechtdach actum den XVIJen dece[m]br[is] m[eeste]r pieter scaeck bekent die copie te leve[re]n wte wtspraeck en[de] die ander p[er]sonen zyn v[er]wonnen by c[on]tinuacie actum den XXen decembr[is] |
| summary | Pieter van Ryn and Jacop van Langevelt sue Willem Dircxz van Tetroede, Jan Pietersz, Foeye Jacopsz, glassmaker, and lawyer Pieter int Scaek to testify the truth about the statements between Pieter de Bot and Claes Dircxz, tax collector, or each pay 10 £. On December 13, Balthazar agrees to deliver the interrogation before the next court session, to be presented to both defendants. On December 17, the case is postponed until the next court session. On December 20, lawyer Pieter Scaeck promises to deliver a copy of the decision and the others lost, because they failed to appear. |
| tags | a:3:{s:7:"keyword";a:1:{i:0;s:9:"glazenier";}s:6:"person";a:1:{i:0;s:25:"Foeye Jacopsz | glazenier";}s:5:"craft";a:1:{i:0;s:9:"glazenier";}} |
| title_archive | archief Schepenbank (Oud Rechterlijk Archief) |