artist
date_end	1530-02-14
date_start	1530-02-14
excerpt_id	746117
quote	ph[i]l[lip]s van zeyst b[eclaecht] die pater van sinte aechten susterhuys buyten leyd[en] wten name van brechte ph[i]l[lip]s dochter profyde suster In tvoirs[eyde] convent om hem te leve[re]n sufficiante Inventar[is] van al zulcke goed[en] als brechte voirs[eyde] mit Katryn Reyers d[ochte]r ghehaelt en[de] ontfangen hebben binnen ymmagen van dorothea der voirs[eyde] brechten moeder of XXV £ groot vl[aem]s daer voer Is gewes[en] alzoe ph[i]l[lip]s van zeyst voirs[eyde] nyet en bewyst dat die suste[re]n eenige goed[en] [“be” stricken out] wt ymagen binnen leyd[en] [“hebbe[n]” in margin] dat daer om die v[er]weerer Ind[en] naem als voe[re]n vry en[de] quyt zel wes[en] vande voirs[eyde] eyssche en[de] ansprake actum den XXVen february
summary	Phillips van Zeyst sues the rector of the Saint Agatha convent outside Leiden in the name of Brechte Phillipsdr, nun in this convent, to deliver an inventory of all the property that Brechte with Katryn Reyersdr had taken and received from Dorothea, the mother of Brechte, in Nijmegen?, or pay 25 £. On February 25, the court decided that Phillips van Zeyst did not prove that the nuns had taken property from Nijmegen? to Leiden, so the defendants are free from the claim.
tags	a:3:{s:7:"keyword";a:2:{i:0;s:8:"schilder";i:1;s:8:"klooster";}s:6:"person";a:2:{i:0;s:29:"Phillips van Zeyst | schilder";i:1;s:20:"Dorothea | overleden";}s:5:"craft";a:2:{i:0;s:8:"schilder";i:1;s:9:"overleden";}}
title_archive	archief Schepenbank (Oud Rechterlijk Archief)