| artist | |
| date_end | 1541-08-19 |
| date_start | 1541-08-19 |
| excerpt_id | 749778 |
| quote | Marie garbrants dochter b[eclaecht] florys hobben z[oon] mit zyn huysvrouwe. aernt Jacops z[oon] goutsmit mit zyn huysvrouwe heynrick pieters z[oon] tymmerman. katryn heynrick willems z[oon]s huysvr[ouw]e. en[de] anna heynricx dochter wylen waerdinne Inde wildeman om[m]e getuychnisse der waerheyt te geve[n] up zekere Interrogatorie diemen hemluyd[en] overleve[re]n zal / off by faulte vandien elcx vyftich karolus guld[en]s daer voer te geven Protesteren[de] etc[etera] // angaen[de] florys hobben z[oon] mit zyn huysvr[ouw]e zal eerst hebben en[de] gelevert word[en] dinterrogatorie / ende dandere p[er]sonen zyn verwonnen by c[on]tinuacie bode willem symons z[oon] actum den XIXen augustj // die voors[eyde] florys mit zyn huysvr[ouw]e v[er]wonnen by [“t” stricken out] c[on]tinuacie actum den XXIJen augustj |
| summary | Marie Garbrantsdr sues Florys Hobbenz with his wife, Aernt Jacopsz, goldsmith, with his wife, Heynrick Pietersz, carpenter, Katryn, wife of Heynrick Willemsz, and Anna Heynricxdr, previously innkeeper in the inn called “Inde Wildeman”, to give true testimony to questions she will provide, or each pay 50 karolus guldens. On August 19, Florys Hobbenz and his wife will receive the written questions and the other defendants lose the case by absence. On August 22, Florys Hobbenz and his wife lose the case by absence. |
| tags | a:3:{s:7:"keyword";a:1:{i:0;s:8:"goudsmid";}s:6:"person";a:1:{i:0;s:24:"Aernt Jacopsz | goudsmid";}s:5:"craft";a:1:{i:0;s:8:"goudsmid";}} |
| title_archive | archief Schepenbank (Oud Rechterlijk Archief) |