artist
date_end	1537-04-30
date_start	1537-04-30
excerpt_id	751332
quote	Tusschen die schout voors[eyd] eysscher ter eenre en[de] cornelis Jans z[oen] mandemaicker verweerder ter andere zyden / beroeren[de] dat die voors[eyd] cornelis Jans z[oen] zekere Juweelen en[de] cleynodien . die zyn huysvrou van een[en] claes Jacops z[oen] snyder In bewaringe ontfangen hadde / gebrocht ofte doen brengen heeft Inde lombaerd tot delft buyten wille weete ofte c[on]sent en[de] tegens danck vanden voorn[oemden] claes Jacops z[oen] etc[etera] Is gewesen alzoe claes Jacops z[oen] voors[eyd] de verweerders huysvr[ou] die voors[eyden] cleynodien en[de] Juweelen willichlick gelevert heeft In bewaringe Dat dair om[m]e die verweerder vry en[de] quyt zell wesen vanden voorn[oemden] schouten eyssche en[de] ansprake up hem dair van gedaen Actum den IIIJen dach In meye anno voors[ey]t
summary	Concerning the case between the sheriff and chief prosecutor on the one side and Cornelis Jansz, basketweaver, defendant, on the other side, about the fact the Cornelis Jansz had brought some jewelry, which his wife had received for safe keeping from Claes Jacopsz, tailor, to the pawn house in Delft, without consent from, and against the wishes of Claes Jacopsz – the court decided that, because Claes Jacopsz had willingly given the jewelry to the defendant’s wife, the defendant is freed from the sheriff and chief prosecutor’s demand. The decision was given on 4 May.
tags	a:1:{s:7:"keyword";a:1:{i:0;s:7:"sieraad";}}
title_archive	archief Schepenbank (Oud Rechterlijk Archief)