• Art in Context
  • Reviews
artist
date_end 1532-03-04
date_start 1532-03-04
excerpt_id 747652
quote Symon buytewech tynnegieter b[eclaecht] meester phillips van henegouwe om hem te voldoen by m[eeste]rs hem dies verstaen[de] ter cause dat hy Janninck zyn neve deur bevel van hem geleert heeft tambocht vande tynnegieterye of drie pont gr[oot] vlaems daer voer Is gewes[en] dat Indien m[eeste]r ph[i]l[lip]s voirs[eyd] zweert als Recht Is dat hy den voirn[oemden] symon buytewech nyet belooft [“e” stricken out] noch zyn neve hem nyet besteedt en heeft dat hy alsdan vry en[de] quyt zel wes[en] vande voirs[eyden] eyssche en[de] ansp[rake . en[de] Is die voirs[eyd] zake [“wtgestelt” in margin] upten eede tot den eersten Rechtdachge nae paesschen toecomen[de] actum den Xjen marty / noch wtgestelt XIIIJ dagen altyts blyven[de] deysscher In zyn Recht actum den XXVJen aprilis
summary Symon Buytewech, pewtersmith, sues Master Phillips van Henegouwe, demanding satifaction as set by experts because he had taught Master Phillips’ nephew Janninck the craft of pewtersmithing, or payment of £ 3. The court postponed the case until the first session after next Easter, stating that if Phillips swore that he had not engaged Symon Buytewech to teach his nephew, Phillips would be absolved of the demand. On 26 April, the case was postponed another fortnight.
tags a:3:{s:7:"keyword";a:2:{i:0;s:11:"tinnegieter";i:1;s:8:"leerling";}s:6:"person";a:1:{i:0;s:29:"Symon Buytewech | tinnegieter";}s:5:"craft";a:1:{i:0;s:11:"tinnegieter";}}
title_archive archief Schepenbank (Oud Rechterlijk Archief), nummer toegang 0508. Civiele Rechtspraak: Inv. nos. 42+1 t/m 42+ 28 (Wedboeken)