| artist | |
| date_end | 1555-05-06 |
| date_start | 1555-05-06 |
| excerpt_id | 765366 |
| quote | Die schepen m[eeste]r[e]n dezer stede b[eclagen] pouwels Willems z[oen] Int guld[en] cantoer Seggen[de] Dat hy een[en] haesgen Jaspers d[ochte]r beclaecht heeft en[de] zy hiete haesgen aelwyns d[ochte]r . en[de] eene hillegont Willems d[ochte]r sond[er] claes van zyl haer man ende voecht al c[on]trarie de keur Dat hy daer an verbeurt heeft volgen[de] Die keur dair van zyn[de] met die costen / Scepen[en] condempne[re]n den verweerder Inde clachte beroeren[de] [“up” stricken out] haesgen Jasp[er]s d[ochte]r . ende angaen[de] hillegont Willems d[ochte]r absolve[re]n scepen[en] Den verweerder vand[en] Instan[tie] actum den lesten In meye anno voors[ey]t |
| summary | Leiden’s magistrates sue Pouwels Willemsz, living in the house called “Int Gulden Cantoer”, asserting that he had accused someone named Haesgen Jaspersdr, while she is named Haesgen Aelwynsdr, and had accused someone named Hillegont Willemsdr without Claes van Zyl, her husband and guardian, contrary to the city ordinance, and that he therefore owes a fine, plus costs. On the last of May, the court found against the defendant in the first charge but absolved him from the second. |
| tags | a:3:{s:7:"keyword";a:1:{i:0;s:13:"schrijnwerker";}s:6:"person";a:1:{i:0;s:32:"Pouwels Willemsz | schrijnwerker";}s:5:"craft";a:1:{i:0;s:13:"schrijnwerker";}} |
| title_archive | archief Schepenbank (Oud Rechterlijk Archief), nummer toegang 0508. Civiele Rechtspraak: Inv. nos. 42+1 t/m 42+ 28 (Wedboeken) |